This post is actually a guest blog that I did for the Geisha School Dropout written by Julie Kang who has been "chronicling the glorious indignities of motherhood since 2005."
___________________________________________
A few days before the verdict, I started listening to the audiobook version of Hofstadter's Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. I am only a few chapters in, but the gist of the book seems to be that we create all meaning in life through the creation of analogies. We constantly categorize everything we see, hear, feel, etc. based on our previous experiences and derive meaning based on how well we can fit the new experience into our mental file cabinet of understanding.
When I heard the verdict, this is immediately what I did. I compared it to Amadou Diallo and Sean Bell and the Jena Six. Then I thought about the 2000 election and Disney World and all the other reasons that Florida sucks. And then I thought of my own personal experiences with racism and dirty cops and the biased legal system. And I started mentally tagging the word Zimmerman with all kinds of labels to try and make sense of it all.
I watched others do the same - on both sides of the argument, and it made me feel a little hopeless that there would ever be justice in cases like this. I applied labels like "things that are: tragic, and racist, and worthy of protest." At the same time I applied labels like “same old shit, and what can I do, and Fuck America!" And for every label I was applying, folks on the other side were assigning categories like: "liberal bullshit, and race baiting, and court of law, and blown out of proportion." And the whole thing becomes another exercise of picking your side but never resolving anything because the argument on both sides is the same: "This issue is analogous to everything I believe in, and the fact that you disagree with me, just proves my point."
Don't get me wrong. I am constantly on the edge of going to battle for all that is right in the world. I worry about my boys and don't want them to have to share the numerous unjust experiences I have had (never mind be a victim of something as horrendous as what happened to Trayvon Martin). I am an optimist at heart, and I still hold on to the ideal that somehow we will all learn from this. I desperately want Trayvon's death to mean something in spite of this verdict and in spite of all those who can't empathize with my experiences and therefore apply different labels.
Unfortunately, I don’t have the perfect solution, but I think it lies somewhere in the difference between “action” and “reaction.” We are really good at (myself included) waiting for this type of thing to happen and then talking about it (and making analogies from it) until the next tragic thing happens. I want to be done having the unwinnable, reactive arguments and start taking action outside of the debates.
Travesties of justice like the Zimmerman case will always be fuel on our activist fires. But if we need to find a way to fight for legal reform, and for a society that is color celebratory instead of color blind, and for a world where our kids are safer and happier and more enlightened without falling into the traps inherent in reacting to things that make us, and our efforts, instant analogies in the minds of those who are more privileged or conservative, or intolerant. So maybe next time someone asks me about the weather, I will respond with, “The forecast predicts clear skies with a lot of heat, just like my plan to educate folks about how beautiful the world can be if we commit to making it that way. This isn’t a non-sequitur, but a better starting point. Join me in a better future.”
___________________________________________
A few days before the verdict, I started listening to the audiobook version of Hofstadter's Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. I am only a few chapters in, but the gist of the book seems to be that we create all meaning in life through the creation of analogies. We constantly categorize everything we see, hear, feel, etc. based on our previous experiences and derive meaning based on how well we can fit the new experience into our mental file cabinet of understanding.
When I heard the verdict, this is immediately what I did. I compared it to Amadou Diallo and Sean Bell and the Jena Six. Then I thought about the 2000 election and Disney World and all the other reasons that Florida sucks. And then I thought of my own personal experiences with racism and dirty cops and the biased legal system. And I started mentally tagging the word Zimmerman with all kinds of labels to try and make sense of it all.
I watched others do the same - on both sides of the argument, and it made me feel a little hopeless that there would ever be justice in cases like this. I applied labels like "things that are: tragic, and racist, and worthy of protest." At the same time I applied labels like “same old shit, and what can I do, and Fuck America!" And for every label I was applying, folks on the other side were assigning categories like: "liberal bullshit, and race baiting, and court of law, and blown out of proportion." And the whole thing becomes another exercise of picking your side but never resolving anything because the argument on both sides is the same: "This issue is analogous to everything I believe in, and the fact that you disagree with me, just proves my point."
Don't get me wrong. I am constantly on the edge of going to battle for all that is right in the world. I worry about my boys and don't want them to have to share the numerous unjust experiences I have had (never mind be a victim of something as horrendous as what happened to Trayvon Martin). I am an optimist at heart, and I still hold on to the ideal that somehow we will all learn from this. I desperately want Trayvon's death to mean something in spite of this verdict and in spite of all those who can't empathize with my experiences and therefore apply different labels.
Unfortunately, I don’t have the perfect solution, but I think it lies somewhere in the difference between “action” and “reaction.” We are really good at (myself included) waiting for this type of thing to happen and then talking about it (and making analogies from it) until the next tragic thing happens. I want to be done having the unwinnable, reactive arguments and start taking action outside of the debates.
Travesties of justice like the Zimmerman case will always be fuel on our activist fires. But if we need to find a way to fight for legal reform, and for a society that is color celebratory instead of color blind, and for a world where our kids are safer and happier and more enlightened without falling into the traps inherent in reacting to things that make us, and our efforts, instant analogies in the minds of those who are more privileged or conservative, or intolerant. So maybe next time someone asks me about the weather, I will respond with, “The forecast predicts clear skies with a lot of heat, just like my plan to educate folks about how beautiful the world can be if we commit to making it that way. This isn’t a non-sequitur, but a better starting point. Join me in a better future.”




RSS Feed